2026 NJCAA JUCO ALUMNI LEADERBOARD
REGION 13 · MON DAK & MINNESOTA COLLEGE ATHLETE CONFERENCES
Miles CC (MT) Leads Region 13’s Alumni Placement Score, Rochester CTC Sets the Efficiency Standard
Miles CC (MT) leads NJCAA Region 13 (Mon Dak & Minnesota College Athlete Conferences) with a 140.8 Raw Alumni Placement Score (APS) — the highest Raw APS of any of the region’s 24 reporting colleges.
Across all 24 Region 13 colleges, 283 alumni are currently active on four-year rosters — spanning NCAA Division I, II, and III, NAIA, NCCAA, and USCAA programs. Starting with this leaderboard, Region 13 is ranked by Alumni Placement Score (APS) rather than raw alumni count alone — a model built to reflect where a program’s alumni are playing, not just how many of them there are. These counts are an annual snapshot, updated as alumni move levels year to year (JUCO to D2, then D2 to D1, for example) — not a full transfer history.
What Is Alumni Placement Score?
Alumni Placement Score weights each alumnus by the level they’re playing at: NCAA Division I counts for 5.0 points, NCAA Division II for 4.3, NAIA for 4.0, NCAA Division III for 3.7, NCCAA for 2.5, and USCAA for 2.0. A program’s Raw APS is the sum of those weighted points across all of its alumni. Two programs with the same number of alumni can post very different Raw APS totals if one is sending players to NCAA Division I rosters and the other to NCCAA rosters — a distinction a simple headcount can’t capture.
Rochester CTC Sets the Efficiency Standard
Rochester CTC posts the region’s best Efficiency APS at 4.24, despite ranking just 9th in Raw APS with 11 alumni. Century ranks second in Raw APS at 117.3, followed by Williston State at 108.3.
Full Region 13 (Mon Dak & Minnesota College Athlete Conferences) Alumni Rankings (2026)
Alexandria Tech & CC posted the best win percentage in Region 13 at .780 (39-11-0) in 2026 — the top mark among all 24 reporting colleges, even though its Raw APS (50.4) ranks 7th.
How These Rankings Are Calculated
Rankings are based on Alumni Placement Score (APS), which weights each alumnus by the level they’re playing at rather than counting every roster spot the same. Total alumni is highlighted alongside Raw APS in the table. When two or more colleges tie on Raw APS, the higher total alumni count breaks the tie; win percentage is the second-level tiebreaker if Total Alumni is also equal. See the 2026 APS methodology for the formula, weights, and FAQ.
Frequently Asked Questions
How many alumni does NJCAA Region 13 have on four-year rosters in 2026?
NJCAA Region 13 (Mon Dak & Minnesota College Athlete Conferences) has 283 alumni currently active on four-year rosters across its 24 reporting colleges, spanning NCAA Division I, II, and III, NAIA, NCCAA, and USCAA programs.
Which Region 13 college has the highest Alumni Placement Score?
Miles CC (MT) leads Region 13 with a Raw APS of 140.8, built on 34 alumni currently active on four-year rosters. Century (117.3) and Williston State (108.3) rank second and third.
What is Efficiency APS and why does it matter?
Efficiency APS divides a program’s Raw APS by its total alumni count, showing placement quality per alumnus rather than total volume. Rochester CTC leads Region 13 in Efficiency APS at 4.24, despite ranking just 9th in Raw APS.
Which Region 13 program has the best win percentage?
Alexandria Tech & CC posted the best win percentage in Region 13 at .780 (39-11-0) in 2026, the top mark among all 24 reporting colleges, despite ranking 7th in Raw APS.
How does Region 13 compare to the rest of NJCAA?
Region 13’s 283 alumni account for about 3.4% of the 8,383 total alumni tracked across all 24 NJCAA regions in 2026. See the full NJCAA All-Regions Summary for the complete national picture.
Explore more NJCAA rankings: All-Regions Summary · Top 25 · D1 Top 20 · D2 Top 20 · D3 Top 10
More Than Just Rankings
A CBI subscription unlocks the full Region 13 leaderboard, plus the detailed division breakdown for every program — exactly how many alumni play at each NCAA division, NAIA, NCCAA, and USCAA level.
Insights reflect data available at time of publication and are subject to change.
